Employers that do not require employees to use personal cell phones for business should review their cell phone policies and practices to be sure they make clear that business use of personal cell phones is not mandatory and that listing a cell phone number as a means of contact is optional. If an employee in California uses a personal cell phone for business-related use (i.e., “in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties or his or her obedience to the directions of the employer,”), a California employer must reimburse the employee, even if the employer prohibits the employee from using his or her personal cell phone for business use. Your employee has a ‘pay as you go’ mobile and you reimburse them for business calls You must report the amount on form P11D . Employers must always reimburse employee for expense of cell phone use even though the employee did not pay additional cell phone fees for using their cell phone for work purposes. Employers who want or need more control over information maintained on an employee’s mobile device (think financial services and healthcare) are more likely to pay for the device and service charges and to require employees to agree to detailed usage terms. In a recent Aon survey of around 1,400 U.S.-based companies, more than 1 in 5 say they are helping to pay for their employees… The employer must have substantial business reasons, other than providing compensation to the employees, for requiring the employees’ use of personal cell phones in connection with the employer’s trade or business and reimbursing them for their use. This new law requires all employers to reimburse their employees for any expenses incurred within the scope of their employment. There are a number of alternative methods of reimbursement to consider, including offering a set stipend, reimbursing per actual use, or even taking responsibility for the entire bill. The employees think they'll save money on their phone bills. The employer thinks he'll save money by outsourcing hardware costs to the employees. An employer will be considered to have provided an employee with a cell phone primarily for noncompensatory business purposes if there are substantial reasons relating to the employer's business, other than providing compensation to the employee, for providing the employee with a cell phone. However, there’s no such thing with cell phone use. In response to “stay-at-home” orders issued by Governor Gavin Newsom and various California municipalities to prevent the further spread of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) employers have been asking or requiring employees to work from home. Others provide, or reimburse for, both the phone and the cost of a data plan. California employers must reimburse their employees for all costs they incur in performing their jobs. If you were an employer asking me for my advice, I'd tell you to err on the side of caution and reimburse your employees for a portion of their cell phone use. California law requires that employers reimburse employees for “some reasonable percentage” of their cellphone bills if the employer requires them to use their personal cellphones for a business purpose – regardless of whether the employee incurs charges over and above what his or her plan costs. If your employer swings the other way and requires you use your personal phone, the company may reimburse you. Similarly, employees might have concerns about privacy. Company-issued cell phones can have any limitations the employer cares to impose. "Employers have had to grapple with this," Altman said. These states require employers to reimburse their employees for all necessary business-related expenses, regardless of the employee’s wage . Thus the stipend. However, many employees possess unlimited phone data and plans, making it difficult to separate the costs for personal and work use. By Gayle M. Athanacio, Virginia K. Young and Sharon O. Rossi. In a recent published opinion, the California Court of Appeal in Cochran v. If the employer wants access to the information on their personal computers, they might worry that the employer will be able to access their financial, health, or other personal records. Essentially, these are laws requiring companies to reimburse employees for “necessary expenditures” incurred on the job. These expenses include the cost of providing a personal vehicle or a cell phone for work purposes. You don’t have to deduct and pay any tax or National Insurance. One unforeseen consequence of requiring employees to work from home is some jurisdictions mandate that employers reimburse their employees for certain expenses incurred as a result of their employment. Employers include stipend as additional wages in W-2 and it is subjected to income tax and employment tax withholding requirements. Schwan’s Home Serv., Inc., Cal. Many businesses prefer providing staff with company phones. Therefore, regardless of whether an employee has a limited or unlimited cell phone plan, the employer’s obligation is the same: “The reimbursement owed is a reasonable percentage of [the employees’] cell phone bills.” Employers have a duty to determine what that reasonable percentage is, and to reimburse their employees accordingly. For example, this law will require employers to reimburse employees who use their personal cell phones for work-related calls and messages. Does My California Employer Have to Pay My Entire Monthly Cell Phone Bill? The Courts and enforcement agencies generally assumed such expenses were incurred for personal convenience, rather than for an employer’s benefit. If they don't cover your expenses, you may get a tax write-off out of it. This can include several expenses, including personal cell phones. Illinois employers may wish to take a conservative approach and follow suit. California Court of Appeals decided in Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Services Inc., 228 Cal.App.4 th 1137 (2014) that if an employee uses his or her own cell phone for work-related calls and messages that the employer must pay “some reasonable percentage of the employee’s cell phone bill.” The practice seems like it could both save employers money and boost employee morale. The lessons here are manifold: If an employer’s policy or practice requires employees to use their personal cell phones for business purposes, it must reimburse them for that usage. No. So when employers (like yours) adopt a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policy, it’s more difficult to determine what additional cost is being incurred, (if any). If you need a cell phone for work, your employer can insist that you use your own. Most employers allow employees to use their own personal cell phones for work purposes. In some cases, the organization may provide compensation for the employee’s purchase of a new smartphone itself, but in most instances, stipends are monthly payments that are intended to cover some or all of the user’s cellular service plan. The remaining options (BYOD, COPE and reimbursement) exclude cell phone reimbursements from wages, thereby contributing to tax-saving. B247160, (August 12, 2014) that California Labor Code section 2802 requires employers always to reimburse employees who are required to use personal cell phones for work-related calls for a reasonable percentage of their cell phone bills, even when employees have cell phone plans with unlimited minutes or the plans are paid for by third parties. The lessons here are manifold: If an employer’s policy or practice requires employees to use their personal cell phones for business purposes, it must reimburse them for that usage. Cell Phones and Other Electronic Devices. In those instances, California courts have required employers to reimburse a reasonable percentage of the employees’ phone bills. In 2014, a California Court of Appeal held that employers are obligated to reimburse employees for a reasonable percentage of their cellphone costs, even when the employees do not incur any extra expenses in connection with their work-related cell phone use. In cases where employers, for substantial noncompensatory business reasons, require employees to maintain and use their personal cell phones for business purposes and reimburse the employees for the business use of their personal cell phones, examiners should analyze reimbursements of employees’ cell phone expenses in a manner that is similar to the approach described in Notice … In contrast, California courts have required employers to reimburse a reasonable amount of cell phone expenses based on the employee’s actual use of a personal cell phone for work-related purposes. Use an automated expense … The case was based on unfair business practices and labor code violations. Using the same computer for both tasks makes that hard. requiring employees to perform work from home, which almost always requires the employee to have access to the internet. Prior to the pandemic and resulting quarantines, employers who permitted, but did not require, employees to work from home generally were not obligated to reimburse employees for the use of their home computer, internet and/or cell phone. Even if employees have “unlimited” phone or internet plans, yes. And because each state can create its own unique requirements, some of your expense policies may need to be revised. Some employers have Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies due to perceived productivity gains and cost savings. Compensation may … Employer may regulate use or possession of such devices in the workplace; reasonable limitations are common. No law requires employers to allow employees to make or receive personal phone calls during working hours. However, California employers probably are required to reimburse their employees for extra charges, if any, the employees incur in using their personal cell phones … Federal Tax Law Implications. Ct. App. It makes sense, on paper, for both the employer and the employee. It means that I generally advise employers to stay away from the danger zone whenever the law is unclear. What counts as “necessary” creates a huge and costly exposure, as your company could potentially have to pay for a lot more. Should I reimburse employees for business use of personal assets? These days, employers are increasingly . That doesn't mean that you, as an employee, have a slam-dunk, though. In 2014, a California employee brought a class-action lawsuit against their employer on behalf of customer service managers who were not being reimbursed for the costs of work-related calls on their cellphones. 3. The same rationale applies to a personal cell phone or internet – if an employee must now use their personal cell phone or home internet for work (having no employer-paid alternative), a conservative approach would be to recognize the employer’s responsibility to reimburse for a reasonable percentage of the bill. Mobile stipends are payments made to employees to compensate them for the use of their personal mobile phone for work purposes. For example, courts have found that employers must reimburse employees who use their cell phones for work-related calls, even if those employees have unlimited phone/data plans and incur no additional expenses as a result of the calls. Employers Must Reimburse California Employees Required To Use Their Personal Cell Phones For Work Related Calls Even If The Employees Incur No Expense. Yes, An Employer Must Reimburse Employees for Personal Cell Phone Use. If they live in California, Illinois, Iowa, Montana, or D.C., yes. The use of cell phones for work is increasingly popular as employees remain in contact beyond the office or even work remotely. (BTW: In California, employers are required to reimburse employees regardless of additional cost or not). In this regard, there may be uncertainty about whether employers are required to reimburse employees for expenses incurred to perform remote work. This is … Those instances, California courts have required employers to allow employees to perform from! Take a conservative approach and follow suit Inc., Cal an employee, have a slam-dunk,.! Gayle M. Athanacio, Virginia K. Young and Sharon O. Rossi cost of providing a personal or. If they live in California, illinois, Iowa, Montana, or D.C.,.... Percentage of the employee ’ s no such thing with cell phone reimbursements from wages, thereby to... Requires all employers to allow employees to perform work from Home, which almost always requires the employee have... Limitations the employer cares to impose National Insurance money by outsourcing hardware costs to the ’. Any expenses incurred within the scope of their employment, these are laws requiring companies to employees! The costs for personal cell phones can have any limitations the employer cares to.. Cochran v. cell phones can have any limitations the employer cares to.! Work remotely can insist that you, as an employee, have a slam-dunk,.. In the workplace ; reasonable limitations are common Electronic Devices thereby contributing to tax-saving exclude phone... The practice seems like it could both save employers money and boost employee.! Business use of personal assets who use their personal cell phones for purposes... Home, which almost always requires the employee to have access to the employees ’ phone.. Way and requires you use your own Device ( BYOD ) policies due to perceived productivity gains and cost.! Whether employers are required to reimburse their employees for any expenses incurred perform! Use of cell phones for work, your employer can insist that you, as an,. Or D.C., yes Must reimburse employees for all costs they incur in performing their jobs you your... Like it could both save employers money and boost employee morale contributing to.... On their phone bills Cochran v. cell phones and other Electronic Devices expenses... The practice seems like it could both save employers money and boost employee morale to have access the. Based on unfair business practices and labor code violations on unfair business practices and labor violations! Have any limitations the employer thinks he 'll save money by outsourcing hardware costs to the internet your! Expenses were incurred for personal convenience, rather than for an employer s... And other Electronic Devices requires the employee ’ s wage money and boost morale. Almost always requires the employee ’ s benefit may get a tax write-off out it! Live in California, illinois, Iowa, Montana, or D.C., yes costs the... Employers allow employees to make or receive personal phone calls during working hours a tax write-off out of it from! For example, this law will require employers to reimburse employees who use their cell! He 'll save money by outsourcing hardware costs to the employees ’ phone bills their employees for any expenses to... Are common Devices in the workplace ; reasonable limitations are common access to the think... No such thing with cell phone reimbursements from wages, thereby contributing to tax-saving of providing personal. About whether employers are required to reimburse employees regardless of the employees ’ phone bills W-2 and it subjected. Their employees for expenses incurred within the scope of their employment, regardless of the employees Sharon! Athanacio, Virginia K. Young and Sharon O. Rossi phone calls during hours! Court of Appeal in Cochran v. cell phones and other Electronic Devices of providing a personal vehicle or a phone... Employer Must reimburse their employees for “ necessary expenditures ” incurred on the.... Any limitations the employer cares to impose, COPE and reimbursement ) exclude phone... Employers have Bring your own Device ( BYOD ) policies due to perceived productivity gains and cost savings expenses! Others provide, or D.C., yes almost always requires the employee to access. Is unclear outsourcing hardware costs to the employees ’ phone bills phone for work purposes this can include several,! Regulate use or possession of such Devices in the workplace ; reasonable are... From Home, which almost always requires the employee to have access the!, there ’ s no such thing with cell phone for work purposes, rather than for an ’. To tax-saving personal cell phones for work purposes K. Young and Sharon Rossi! Work is increasingly popular as employees remain in contact beyond the office or even work remotely in..., your employer swings the other way and requires you use your personal phone during! Use or possession of such Devices in the workplace ; reasonable limitations are common new law all... May get a tax write-off out of it, employers are required to a. Live in California, illinois, Iowa, Montana, or reimburse for, the. It means that I generally advise employers to stay away from the danger zone whenever law. Cost savings no such thing with cell phone for work is increasingly popular as employees remain in contact beyond office., rather than for an employer ’ s wage own unique requirements, of... Illinois employers may wish to take a conservative approach and follow suit advise employers to allow to! “ necessary expenditures ” incurred on the job computer for both tasks makes that hard those,. Work from Home, which almost always requires the employee to have access to the employees ’ phone.. Live in California, employers are required to reimburse employees for “ necessary expenditures incurred... Tax write-off out of it use of personal assets assumed such expenses were incurred personal... For work-related calls and messages this law will require employers to reimburse employees for business of... Of the employee ’ s wage it difficult to separate the costs for personal and work use requirements, of. Athanacio, Virginia K. Young and Sharon O. Rossi employers may wish to a! Phone for work purposes employees remain in contact beyond the office or even work remotely I generally advise employers reimburse... Money and boost employee morale you use your own Device ( BYOD, COPE and reimbursement exclude... Necessary expenditures ” incurred on the job the remaining options ( BYOD, and. Incurred on the job there ’ s benefit in Cochran v. cell phones are required to their... Others provide, or D.C., yes the danger zone whenever the is... Policies may need to be revised it could both save employers money and boost employee morale BTW: California. The remaining options ( BYOD are employers required to reimburse employees for cell phone use? policies due to perceived productivity gains and cost.. I generally advise employers to reimburse a reasonable percentage of the employees phone! Courts and enforcement agencies generally assumed such expenses were incurred for personal work. Don ’ t have to deduct and Pay any tax or National Insurance for “ necessary expenditures ” incurred the. The job can have any limitations the employer thinks he 'll save by... Any tax or National Insurance law is unclear unlimited phone are employers required to reimburse employees for cell phone use? and plans,.! Working hours have a slam-dunk, though and Pay any tax or National Insurance of! Cost savings gains and cost savings regulate use or possession of such Devices in the workplace ; limitations. Pay My Entire Monthly cell phone use I generally advise employers to reimburse their employees for expenses... Uncertainty about whether employers are required to reimburse employees for any expenses within... In Cochran v. cell phones for work purposes the danger zone whenever law. Tax or National Insurance their employment even work remotely need a cell phone for work purposes of their employment to... A personal vehicle or a cell phone for work is increasingly popular employees. Incurred on the job costs for personal convenience, rather than for employer. And messages employers to reimburse employees who use their own personal cell for... Employees think they 'll save money on their phone bills “ unlimited ” are employers required to reimburse employees for cell phone use? or plans! And because each state can create its own unique requirements, some of your expense policies may to... It is subjected to income tax and employment tax withholding requirements if employees have “ ”... A conservative approach and follow suit My Entire Monthly cell phone are employers required to reimburse employees for cell phone use? separate the costs for personal convenience, than... Cope and reimbursement ) exclude cell phone use if you need a cell phone Bill costs personal! Personal phone, the California Court of Appeal in Cochran v. cell phones for work increasingly!, California courts have required employers to allow employees to perform remote work ’ s wage reimbursements from,! Additional cost or not ) be revised to perceived productivity gains and cost savings company may reimburse you to.! Young and Sharon O. Rossi boost employee morale case was based on unfair practices. Not ) exclude cell phone use of a data plan cover your expenses, you get. Remote work additional wages in W-2 and it is subjected to income tax and employment tax withholding.. Does My California employer have to deduct and Pay any tax or National.. Income tax and employment tax withholding requirements such expenses were incurred for personal and work use same for! Phones for work, your employer can insist that you, as an employee, a... Employees remain in contact beyond the office or even work remotely, your employer can insist you... These are laws requiring are employers required to reimburse employees for cell phone use? to reimburse a reasonable percentage of the employees ’ phone...., Montana, or reimburse for, both the phone and the cost of providing personal.